HomeMedical SpecialtiesCardiologyWait time guidelines needed for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implementation

Wait time guidelines needed for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implementation

Published on

A new study suggests that modest delays in receiving transcatheter aortic valve implementation (TAVI) for severe aortic stenosis could have a substantial impact on the effectiveness of treatment.

Aortic stenosis is a narrowing of the aortic valve opening that restricts normal blood flow to the body.  Patients are typically older and often have other health issues, making them high risk for conventional surgery.  TAVI has emerged as the preferred treatment for these patients as the replacement valve is implanted through a small incision in the groin or between the ribs, eliminating the need for a large chest incision.  There is, however, a lack of data about what is an acceptable wait time for patients deemed as good candidates for TAVI.

MORE: 1000th TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE PROCEDURE

A team of investigators from the University of Toronto and the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences in Toronto have used mathematical modeling with the results from a landmark randomized trial, Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER), to look what happens when TAVI wait times are increased.  Even modest increases in wait times were found to have a substantial impact on how effective TAVI is in otherwise inoperable patients and high-risk surgical candidates.

“To our knowledge, our study is the first to evaluate the effect of delayed access to TAVI, and provides insight into the importance of wait time and outcomes,” says lead investigator Dr. Harindra Wijeysundera, interventional cardiologist at Sunnybrook’s Schulich Heart Centre and assistant professor at the University of Toronto.  “Creating benchmarks for appropriate wait times should be a priority.”

Published in the Canadian Journal of Cardiology, the study suggests that although TAVI would result in fewer deaths in patients deemed inoperable regardless of wait time, the magnitude of benefit decreased dramatically. In the high-risk surgical candidates, at TAVI wait times beyond 60 days, TAVI was less effective on average compared with conventional surgery.

MORE: THE DIABETES EPIDEMIC

“Our findings have implications on care delivery for severe aortic stenosis patients who are TAVI candidates.  Because of the importance of wait-time monitoring, ideally detailed information should be collected on the time of referral for TAVI work-up, the time at which diagnostic work-up is complete, and the time at which a patient is accepted for the procedure,” says Dr. Wijeysundera.  “Data on delays in any of these intervals should be made available to programs in a timely fashion, such that cases can be triaged. This is especially important for the patients deemed as good candidates for surgery. The clinical decision of when high-risk surgery is preferable over TAVI should incorporate the program’s current TAVI wait time, and the associated potential wait-time mortality.”

Latest articles

An ER doctor’s experience with long COVID – “My symptoms seemed endless”

On April 2022, another COVID wave was sweeping Toronto. It was the sixth since...

Tackling the issue of unused medication waste

When patients and programs don’t use all the medication that is prescribed, it is...

Obesity a risk factor for stillbirth, especially at term

Obesity is a risk factor for stillbirth, and the risk increases as pregnancy advances...

Prolonged cough? In most cases, patience is the treatment

Coughing after a respiratory infection is common and, in most cases, will resolve with...

More like this

Prolonged cough? In most cases, patience is the treatment

Coughing after a respiratory infection is common and, in most cases, will resolve with...

A New Era in Heart Failure Management: The Promise of Digital Therapeutics

Heart failure is one of the fastest growing cardiovascular conditions in the world that...

Funding to take LHSC developed technology global

On average it takes five to seven years to diagnose a rare disease. But,...

Milk and Colorectal Cancer: what does the research say?

Colorectal cancer is the fourth most common cancer in Canada and is more common...

Surgical guidance with AI

Researchers at UHN’s Toronto General Hospital Research Institute (TGHRI) have utilized artificial intelligence (AI)...

Report outlines public health response to COVID-19 outbreaks at mink farms

A report co-authored by Fraser Health Medical Health Officer Dr. Emily Newhouse and published...